Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
65
Highlights
60
Differences
5
Reactions
0
Likes
Blue Yeti
vs
MXL 990:
65 Highlights & 60 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
A detailed comparison of the sound and features of Blue Yeti and MXL 990. Get the lowdown on what makes each mic unique.
From connection interface, power source, onboard controls & stand/tripod to hands-on reviews, we broke down what makes Blue Yeti different from MXL 990 in this side-by-side microphones comparison.
Blue Yeti vs MXL 990: Choosing the Right Condenser Microphone for Your Studio or Streaming Setup
When it comes to condenser microphones, the Blue Yeti and MXL 990 stand out as popular choices tailored to distinct applications. Both microphones excel in capturing detailed audio with clarity, yet they cater to different user skill levels and recording environments. The Blue Yeti offers a versatile USB interface with multiple polar pattern options, perfect for podcasting, streaming, and general desktop use. Meanwhile, the MXL 990 is a classic side-address condenser mic with a cardioid pattern, designed for studio and instrument recording that requires XLR connectivity and phantom power.
Both mics deliver reliable performance and quality sound, but understanding their core differences in form factor, connectivity, and features will guide you toward the best fit for your needs. The Blue Yeti prioritizes plug-and-play convenience with onboard controls and adjustable stand options, while the MXL 990 focuses on professional-grade audio capture with traditional studio setups.
A Close Look at the Blue Yeti's Versatility and User-Friendly Design
The Blue Yeti truly shines as an all-around USB microphone with an impressive four-pattern capability ; Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional, and Stereo. This flexibility makes it ideal for creators who value adaptability, from solo streaming sessions to multi-person interviews or rich ambient sound capture. Its desktop form factor with a sturdy adjustable arm/stand offers easy placement and swivel/pivot adjustments, suiting various recording angles and desks.
Connectivity couldn't be simpler: the USB interface with a detachable cable plugs directly into your computer, requiring no additional audio equipment. Power comes via USB, and on the hardware side, the Blue Yeti boasts onboard mute control, gain dial, and a handy monitoring mix control for real-time headphone monitoring without delay. These features make it a breeze for beginners and professionals alike to fine-tune sound on the fly.
In terms of audio specs, the Blue Yeti handles peaks up to 120 dB overload point with low distortion (THD of about 0.5%), delivering clean and professional recordings. The package also includes a tripod stand and adapters, although it doesn't have a dedicated carrying case.
Why the MXL 990 Remains a Top Pick for Studio Purists
The MXL 990 embraces a more traditional studio microphone role with a single cardioid polar pattern that's favored for focused, direct sound capture. Its compact side-address design suits professional studio arms and mounts better than bulkier desktop models, lending itself well to vocal booths and instrument miking.
Unlike the USB-powered Blue Yeti, the MXL 990 relies on an XLR connection that requires phantom power from an audio interface or mixer. This means it's more suitable for users with intermediate to professional experience who value higher fidelity and are equipped with external preamps. However, the microphone lacks onboard controls such as mute or gain knobs, so precise adjustment happens through the interface or mixer.
Its build includes a detachable mount and swivel pivot capability for flexible positioning, plus it comes with a sturdy carrying case, an advantage for portability and safe transport between setups. While detailed distortion and overload specs aren't provided, the MXL 990 has earned its reputation for warm, classic condenser tones that suit studio vocals and instruments well at an accessible price point.
Quick Take
The Blue Yeti is a go-to for podcasters, streamers, and beginners who want an easy-to-use, multi-pattern USB microphone with handy onboard features. On the other hand, the MXL 990 appeals to audiophiles and studio pros prioritizing XLR connectivity and a focused cardioid pattern for controlled, professional recordings.
Bottom Line: Which Microphone Should You Pick?
If you want versatility, simplicity, and quick setup with broad recording capabilities, the Blue Yeti stands out as the better choice. Its USB plug-and-play design with multiple polar patterns and control knobs offers unmatched convenience. Meanwhile, select the MXL 990 if you seek a more classic studio condenser mic, are comfortable managing phantom power and interfaces, and want a compact, professional cardioid mic optimized for vocal and instrument capture.
Ultimately, your skill level and recording environment determine the best match. The Blue Yeti fits diverse creators and casual use, whereas the MXL 990 caters to dedicated studio professionals craving traditional, high-quality sound.
Verdict
Winner:Blue Yeti - Ideal for versatile, beginner-friendly USB recording with multiple polar patterns and built-in controls.
Runner-up:MXL 990 - Best suited for studio professionals who prefer XLR setup and classic cardioid sound quality in a compact form.
72
Blue Yeti
1Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional, Stereo
65
MXL 990
0Votes
Cardioid
vs
Polar Pattern Type
The Blue Yeti offers multiple polar pattern types including Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional, and Stereo, while the MXL 990 supports only Cardioid. This makes Blue Yeti more versatile for various recording scenarios, making it more suitable for users needing diverse pickup patterns.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
MXL 990 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I really like how the Blue Yeti offers four different polar patterns. It's super versatile and lets me switch between cardioid and stereo easily. The MXL 990 only has a cardioid pattern so I prefer the flexibility of Blue Yeti.
Blue Yeti is intended for Podcast and Streaming purposes, and MXL 990 targets Studio, Voice Recording, and Instrument use. Blue Yeti fits content creators, while MXL 990 suits musicians and professional studio recorders better.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
46
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Beginner, Intermediate, Professional
70
MXL 990
0Votes
Intermediate, Professional
vs
User Skill Level
Blue Yeti covers Beginner, Intermediate, and Professional skill levels, offering broad usability. MXL 990 is designed for Intermediate and Professional users only. Blue Yeti is more accessible for beginners.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti has a Desktop form factor, whereas MXL 990 uses a Side-Address form factor. Desktop form factor suits stationary podcast setups, while Side-Address is preferred in studio environments. Choose Blue Yeti for desktop use and MXL 990 for studio voice recording.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Form Factor,
Blue Yeti ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
MXL 990 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Blue Yeti's desktop form factor works perfectly for my streaming desk. It's easier to set up and move around compared to the side-address design of MXL 990. For my use case I'd pick Blue Yeti.
Blue Yeti is not a limited edition, whereas MXL 990 has no mention of limited edition, effectively unavailable. Both microphones are standard editions; choice depends on other features rather than edition rarity.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
86
Blue Yeti
0Votes
PC
35
MXL 990
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface
Blue Yeti
Compatible primarily with PC platforms, ensuring easy integration for common recording setups.
MXL 990
The microphone is compatible with standard audio equipment like a Mixer, Audio Interface, facilitating integration into various recording setups.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
51 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
73
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Teen, Adult, Professional
75
MXL 990
0Votes
Adult, Professional
Blue Yeti
Designed for a wide age group including teens, adults, and professionals to suit diverse users and skill levels.
MXL 990
The target age group for this microphone is Adult, Professional users, aligning with its sophisticated features and applications.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
61
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Condenser, USB
45
MXL 990
0Votes
Condenser
MXL 990
This product is a Condenser microphone, distinguished by its high sensitivity and wide frequency response, making it suitable for capturing nuances in sound.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
66
Blue Yeti
0Votes
YETI
52
MXL 990
0Votes
MXL 990
MXL 990
The model name of this microphone is MXL 990.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
52
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Yeti Series
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
Belongs to the well-known 'Yeti' series, a trusted name in USB microphones for streaming and podcasting.
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
46
Blue Yeti
0Votes
2009
35
MXL 990
0Votes
2005
Blue Yeti
Year of release is 2009, indicating the model's introduction date to the market.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
66
Blue Yeti
0Votes
USB
35
MXL 990
0Votes
Wired, XLR
Blue Yeti
Connectivity type is USB, ensuring easy plug-and-play compatibility with most computers and recording devices.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
56
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Silver
59
MXL 990
0Votes
Champagne, White
Blue Yeti
The microphone comes in a silver color option, providing a sleek and professional aesthetic.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
56
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Desktop Base, Boom Arm
58
MXL 990
0Votes
Shock Mount, Stand, Boom Arm
MXL 990
It supports multiple mounting types, including a Shock Mount, Stand, and Boom Arm, providing flexible placement options for studio or live applications.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
96
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Unisex
95
MXL 990
0Votes
Unisex
Blue Yeti
Designed for unisex users, making it broadly accessible without gender-specific features.
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
66
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Global
65
MXL 990
0Votes
Global
Blue Yeti
This product is marketed and available globally, catering to a wide range of users worldwide.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
71
Blue Yeti
0Votes
China
90
MXL 990
0Votes
United States
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Application Category
What recording applications is it best for?
84
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Podcast, Broadcast, Streaming, Studio
83
MXL 990
0Votes
Studio, Podcast
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti height is 11.61 inches, significantly taller than MXL 990 at 5.11 inches. If compactness is a priority, MXL 990 is more suitable; Blue Yeti offers a larger presence suitable for desktop setups.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
6.5 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Capsule Length
Blue Yeti capsule length is 0.8 inches; capsule length data for MXL 990 is unavailable. Blue Yeti offers detailed specs useful for enthusiasts concerned with microphone capsule design.
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
3.2
lbs
0Votes
1.2
lbs
0Votes
Blue Yeti
The weight is 3.2 pounds (1.45 kg), making it relatively sturdy yet portable for a desktop microphone.
MXL 990
Weighing in at 1.2 lbs (0.54 kg), this microphone is relatively lightweight, making it easy to position on a stand.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
96
Blue Yeti
0Votes
5/8"
95
MXL 990
0Votes
5/8"
Blue Yeti
Features a 5/8-inch mounting thread size, which is a common thread size compatible with many microphone stands and shock mounts.
MXL 990
It features a 5/8" mounting thread size, which is the standard for most microphone stands and shock mounts.
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
4.72
inch
0Votes
2.36
inch
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Width measures 4.72 inches (11.99 cm), reflecting the size of the microphone body.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Depth,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
6.7
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Width
Blue Yeti package width is 6.7 inches, while MXL 990's package width is unavailable. This suggests Blue Yeti's physical packaging might be easier to assess for space planning, making it preferable for users conscious of package size.
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
11.2
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Depth
Blue Yeti has a package depth of 11.2 inches; MXL 990 lacks this data. Blue Yeti’s known depth helps users plan workspace setup, which is beneficial for desktop placement considerations.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
6.5
ft
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
Cable length is 6.5 feet (1.98 meters), providing ample reach for desktop setup flexibility.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
6
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
Stand or arm length is 6 inches (15.24 cm), suitable for desktop use and easy adjustment.
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
0.55
inch
0Votes
0.78
inch
0Votes
vs
Capsule Diameter
Capsule diameter on Blue Yeti is 0.55 inches, compared to 0.78 inches on MXL 990. MXL 990 has a larger capsule, potentially offering better sound capture for studio recordings, making it ideal for detailed vocal or instrument recording.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
In the battle of Capsule Diameter,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
2.4
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
Grill diameter is 2.4 inches (6.10 cm), providing physical protection for the capsule while allowing good sound transmission.
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
4.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
THD
Blue Yeti has 0.5% Total Harmonic Distortion (THD); MXL 990’s THD is unavailable. Blue Yeti offers transparent sound with low distortion, benefiting users focusing on clear audio quality.
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Gain Range
Blue Yeti features a 60 dB gain range versus unavailable gain range info for MXL 990. Blue Yeti’s adjustable gain offers flexibility in various recording scenarios.
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Overload Point
Blue Yeti overload point is 120 dB, while MXL 990’s overload point is unavailable. Blue Yeti can handle louder sound peaks effectively, making it preferable for dynamic audio environments.
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti lacks proximity effect control; MXL 990 also lacks this feature. Neither microphone offers this feature, so users who need proximity effect control should consider other options.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
100
dB
0Votes
80
dB
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Signal-to-noise ratio is 100 dB, indicating clear audio capture with relatively low noise floor.
MXL 990
A signal-to-noise ratio of 80 dB indicates a clear audio signal with minimal background hiss, resulting in professional-quality recordings.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
In the battle of Signal-to-Noise Ratio,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
20.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
56
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Dual (Stereo & Mono)
5
MXL 990
0Votes
Mono
Blue Yeti
The microphone supports both stereo and mono modes, allowing versatile audio channel configurations.
MXL 990
This microphone operates in Mono mode, capturing a single audio channel, which is typical for individual vocal or instrument recordings.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
51 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
66
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
65
MXL 990
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
Blue Yeti
Operates on the pressure gradient principle, common in condenser microphones for accurate directional response.
MXL 990
Operating on the Pressure Gradient acoustic principle, this microphone is sensitive to changes in sound pressure, which is characteristic of condenser microphones.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-37
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-36.5
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Output level is -37 dBV/Pa, consistent with the microphone's sensitivity rating.
MXL 990
With an output level of -36.5 dBV/Pa, this microphone provides a strong signal that is easy to work with in most recording setups.
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
In the battle of Output Level,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
44
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Standard
43
MXL 990
0Votes
Standard
Blue Yeti
Features a standard internal preamp, providing reliable amplification suitable for most podcasting and streaming needs.
MXL 990
Equipped with a Standard internal preamp, it provides reliable signal boosting before reaching your audio interface.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
In the battle of Internal Preamp Quality,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
96
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Transformerless
95
MXL 990
0Votes
Transformerless
Blue Yeti
Built with a transformerless design which typically offers better sound fidelity and lower distortion.
MXL 990
The microphone features a Transformerless design, which typically results in a flatter frequency response and lower noise floor compared to transformer-coupled designs.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
56
Blue Yeti
0Votes
USB, Condenser
85
MXL 990
0Votes
Condenser
Blue Yeti
This USB condenser microphone is designed for clear, accurate sound capture with convenient USB connectivity.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
74
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
73
MXL 990
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
Blue Yeti
Employs a large diaphragm capsule, known for capturing richer and fuller sound, especially vocals.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
20
Hz
0Votes
30
Hz
0Votes
Blue Yeti
The frequency response starts at 20 Hz, capable of capturing deep bass sounds.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
10.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-37
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-36.5
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Sensitivity is rated at -37 dBV/Pa, indicating the microphone's output voltage level relative to the sound pressure level.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
120
dB
0Votes
118
dB
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Dynamic range of 120 dB enables capturing audio from very quiet to very loud sounds with clarity.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
In the battle of Dynamic Range,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
120
dB
0Votes
130
dB
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Max SPL (sound pressure level) is 120 dB, which enables handling loud audio sources without distortion.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
10.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
20
dB
0Votes
20
dB
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Equivalent noise level is 20 dB, indicating the self-noise produced by the microphone itself.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
50
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional, Stereo
55
MXL 990
0Votes
Cardioid
Blue Yeti
Supports multiple directionality modes including cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo to cover diverse recording scenarios.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
20
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
The microphone provides a headroom of 20 dB, allowing it to handle loud sound sources without distortion.
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
96
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Fast
95
MXL 990
0Votes
Fast
Blue Yeti
Has fast transient response, meaning it can accurately capture quick changes in sound such as percussive attacks.
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
In the battle of Transient Response,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
15
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
Off-axis rejection of 15 dB helps reduce unwanted sounds coming from the sides or rear of the microphone.
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
61
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Stepped
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
The polar pattern switching is stepped, allowing distinct selection between modes to tailor the microphone's directional characteristics.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
20,000
Hz
0Votes
20,000
Hz
0Votes
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
equal
20,000.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1,000
Ω
0Votes
vs
Minimum Terminating Impedance
Blue Yeti does not provide a minimum terminating impedance, while MXL 990 has 1000 Ω. This indicates MXL 990 may be better suited for professional studio gear requiring impedance matching.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti connects via USB, making it plug-and-play for most users, while MXL 990 uses XLR connection, requiring an audio interface. Choose Blue Yeti for ease of use and MXL 990 for professional studio integration.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
31 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Connection Interface,
Blue Yeti ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
MXL 990 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
MXL 990's XLR connection is great for professional setups and gives me higher quality sound. Blue Yeti's USB is convenient but sometimes not as reliable for studio work. I definitely lean towards the MXL 990 here.
The Blue Yeti has built-in mute and gain controls which I find really helpful for quick adjustments while recording. MXL 990 doesn't have these onboard controls so I have to rely on other gear. I prefer the Blue Yeti for this reason.
See more
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
59
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Digital, Unbalanced
58
MXL 990
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
Blue Yeti
Audio output options include digital and unbalanced formats, providing compatibility with various recording setups.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
Yes
0Votes
MXL 990
MXL 990
Phantom power support is enabled, indicating the microphone requires and can receive 48V phantom power from an XLR connection.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
5
ms
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Blue Yeti
The interface latency is 5 milliseconds, contributing to low-latency monitoring and minimal audio delay.
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
16
Blue Yeti
0Votes
Unbalanced
35
MXL 990
0Votes
Balanced
Blue Yeti
Output is unbalanced, which is common for USB microphones designed for straightforward connection setups.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
worse than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
93
MXL 990
0Votes
Standard
MXL 990
The microphone uses a Standard XLR pin configuration, ensuring broad compatibility with professional audio cables and equipment.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti draws power from USB, making it suitable for simple plug-and-play setups, while MXL 990 uses Phantom power, requiring compatible audio interfaces, better for studio pros.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti does not support external power supply compatibility; this info is unavailable for MXL 990, suggesting it might not support it either.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
0
Volt
0Votes
48
Volt
0Votes
MXL 990
The microphone requires 48 Volt phantom power for operation, a standard power supply for professional condenser microphones.
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
In the battle of Phantom Power Requirement,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.14
Watt
0Votes
MXL 990
The microphone has a power consumption of 0.14 Watt, which is efficient for phantom-powered devices.
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light
Does it have a power indicator light?
Yes
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
vs
Power Indicator Light
Blue Yeti features a power indicator light, while this feature is not available for MXL 990, aiding users in easily confirming device status.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
15
Blue Yeti
0Votes
USB Type-B
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Onboard Controls
Blue Yeti offers onboard controls including buttons, switches, and knobs; MXL 990 does not provide onboard controls, favoring Blue Yeti for ease of use.
Types of direct physical controls.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti includes a mute function, beneficial for live streaming or recording; this feature is absent in MXL 990, making Blue Yeti more user-friendly in real-time control.
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mute Function on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti supports monitoring mix control, allowing direct audio monitoring; MXL 990 does not have this feature, making Blue Yeti preferable for live sound monitoring.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Blue Yeti has LED indicator lights to provide visual feedback of status; MXL 990 lacks this feature, making Blue Yeti easier to monitor during sessions.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
App or software integration is not available for either Blue Yeti or MXL 990, so users should expect manual control only.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
Yes
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Blue Yeti
Includes gain control feature to adjust the input level for optimal recording volume.
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
Yes
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Blue Yeti
Equipped with headphone monitoring functionality, this feature enables real-time audio monitoring without latency, vital for professional-grade recording.
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
better than
MXL 990 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Blue Yeti
This microphone does not have touch or motion controls, relying on manual physical controls instead.
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
Who knows?
0Votes
Blue Yeti
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
MXL 990
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
Blue Yeti
No
0Votes
MXL 990
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
I like that the MXL 990 comes with a carrying case. It makes transporting it easier and safer, especially since it's a more delicate studio mic. The Blue Yeti doesn't have one which is a downside for me.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Blue Yeti ◉ is
same as
MXL 990 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Blue Yeti ◉
vs MXL 990 ◉ and help others decide!
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
13
18
